|
|
||||||||
Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Closed-loop supply chains differ significantly from forward supply chains in many aspects. These differences are not well understood in many contexts, and the situation is complicated by many types of product returns. Progress is slow since closed-loop supply chains are rarely considered as value-creating systems, and much of the focus is on the operational aspects, rather than the larger strategic issues. Interest is growing in the US because of the potential profitability and in the European Union because of legislation. New business models need to be developed by joint cooperation between industry and academia that take a life-cycle approach to products.
Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Technology Management Area, INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex, France
dguide{at}psu.edu
tharrison{at}psu.edu
luk.van-wassenhove{at}insead.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Geyer, L. N. Van Wassenhove, and A. Atasu The Economics of Remanufacturing Under Limited Component Durability and Finite Product Life Cycles Management Science, January 1, 2007; 53(1): 88 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. D. R. Guide Jr., L. Muyldermans, and L. N. Van Wassenhove Hewlett-Packard Company Unlocks the Value Potential from Time-Sensitive Returns Interfaces, July 1, 2005; 35(4): 281 - 293. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lev Book Reviews Interfaces, January 1, 2005; 35(1): 102 - 110. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |