Interfaces
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


INTERFACES
Vol. 37, No. 3, May-June 2007, pp. 209-219
DOI: 10.1287/inte.1060.0264
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loveland, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Morrice, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Dell Uses a New Production-Scheduling Algorithm to Accommodate Increased Product Variety

Jennifer L. Loveland, Susan K. Monkman, Douglas J. Morrice

Dell, Inc., Americas Process Engineering, 1 Dell Way, Round Rock, Texas 78682
Graduate School of Business and Public Policy, Naval Postgraduate School, 555 Dyer Road, Monterey, California 93943
McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, Texas 78712

jennifer_loveland{at}dell.com
skheath{at}nps.edu
morrice{at}mail.utexas.edu

Early in 2003, with continually increasing product variety and production volumes, Dell, Inc. had reached the designed capacity limits of one of its main production facilities, the Morton L. Topfer Manufacturing Center (TMC). In 2004, TMC was facing a doubling of the number of product families it produced, with an anticipated degradation in production rates of nearly 20 percent. To help assuage this problem, we developed a new production-scheduling algorithm, which contains both optimization and heuristic components. The algorithm schedules product families on parallel, identical kitting lines to minimize the number of setups required and to reduce downtime and slow time during setups. Because of our work, Dell was able to accommodate the twofold increase in product variety, as well as an effective production-volume increase of over 35 percent. Furthermore, Dell realized a conservative cost avoidance of more than {$}1 million annually, primarily because it saved overtime costs that it would have required, in the absence of our solution, to handle the increases in production volume and product variety. This solution has been in operation at TMC since June 2004.

Key Words: production scheduling; heuristic; optimization; product families; parallel lines; assemble-to-order






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.