Interfaces
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


INTERFACES
Vol. 37, No. 3, May-June 2007, pp. 279-284
DOI: 10.1287/inte.1060.0249
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hew, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Direct Advisors vs. Tool Developers—Implications for Practice

Patrick Hew

Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Russell Offices R1-3-C075, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
patrick.hew{at}dsto.defence.gov.au

The operations research market may be shifting from the direct provision of advice to clients to the development of tools that clients can use themselves. Driving this change is the commodification of information processing. Practitioners will find new opportunities in providing the expert software components within decision-support systems.

Key Words: decision analysis; systems; professional; OR/MS implementation



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
InterfacesHome page
B. Lev
Book Reviews
Interfaces, May 1, 2008; 38(3): 212 - 220.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.