Interfaces
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


INTERFACES
Vol. 38, No. 4, July-August 2008, pp. 251-262
DOI: 10.1287/inte.1080.0378
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gurgur, C. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Morley, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Optimizes Infrastructure Project-Portfolio Selection

Cigdem Z. Gurgur, Charles T. Morley

Division of Business and Economics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401
Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, Denver, Colorado 80201

cgurgur{at}mines.edu
tom.morley{at}lmco.com

Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company spends millions of dollars on the maintenance and modernization of its infrastructure each year. Projects often involve investments that cannot be justified purely in terms of net present value or other classical investment-evaluation methods. The options are also restricted because funds that are not spent within a given time frame must be relinquished. Furthermore, some projects may be delayed and the unplanned carryover of their costs moved into the next fiscal year; this causes the postponement or cancellation of other unrelated projects because of in-budget transfers. In this paper, we used multiattribute utility theory and chance-constrained programming to optimize the selection of infrastructure projects. Our solution ensured the selection of high-value projects to maximize the company's performance. These selections were subject to the constraints that a portfolio did not exceed the available budget and that the carryover of the unspent funds to the next fiscal year did not exceed predetermined limits. We used Microsoft Excel to ensure broad accessibility, transparency, user interaction, improved data collection and asset management, and ease-of-use by managers.

Key Words: capital rationing; chance-constrained programming; multiattribute utility theory; budgetary carryover; spreadsheet applications






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.